4.7 Review

Recent advances of covalent organic frameworks for solid-phase microextraction

期刊

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2021.116208

关键词

Covalent organic frameworks; Porous materials; Solid-phase microextraction; Organic pollutants; Extraction mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21777054]
  2. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [ZR2019MB058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

COFs are a booming class of porous materials assembled through covalent bonds, with excellent properties and flexible design. They show good extraction effects in sample preparation, especially in SPME applications.
Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are one booming class of porous materials that are assembled through covalent bonds. Owing to the excellent properties including three-dimensional frameworks, large specific surface, porous structure, multiple functional groups, good absorptivity, flexible design about various COFs, it has been introduced in sample preparation and some efficient COF coatings have been developed for solid-phase microextraction (SPME). COFs can be synthesized by different methods, and they also can be functionalized or modified for the regulation of their properties, so as to improve extraction performance. These COF materials presented good extraction effect to organic pollutants from diverse samples. This review paper focuses on the classification of COFs and their applications in SPME (direct immersion fiber SPME, headspace fiber SPME, and other SPME) as well as the extraction mechanism (pi-pi stacking, hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic, hydrophilic and electrostatic interactions, etc.) for various analytes in recent five years. Based on the flexible design and rich functionalization, COFs have large potential applications in sample preparation, and an outlook for current challenges and future trends about the development of COFs for SPME is also given. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据