4.4 Article

What Role Does the Electric Double Layer Play in Redox Reactions at Planar Electrostatically Charged Insulating Surfaces?

期刊

TOPICS IN CATALYSIS
卷 65, 期 1-4, 页码 228-233

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11244-021-01418-z

关键词

Electric double layer; Single-electrode electrochemistry; Gouy-Chapman model; Electrostatic potential

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [1R01EB025867]
  2. Air Force Office of Scientific Research through Basic Research Initiative grant
  3. AFOSR [FA9550-12-1-0400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the importance of the chemical reactivity of charge carriers on the surface compared to the voltage caused by density of charges in single-electrode electrochemistry. The research concludes that single-electrode reactions are primarily caused by chemical reactivity of charge carriers on the electrode surface rather than discharging the static charge.
Redox reactions have been observed when an electrostatically charged insulator is placed in contact with a solution, and this phenomenon is referred to as single-electrode electrochemistry. In this study we explore how important is the chemical reactivity of the charge carriers on the surface compared to the voltage caused by the density of charges on the surface which set up an electric double layer. We address complications arising from the surface potential's dependence upon the electrolyte concentration caused by the fixed surface charge density of the electrode. We present an analytical solution for the effective potential in single-electrode electrochemistry at a planar surface and show that it is not the same as the potential at the insulating surface. We reach two major conclusions: (1) the voltage applied to the reaction from discharging the electrode approaches a limiting value, and (2) the majority of single-electrode reactions are caused primarily by the chemical reactivity of the charge carrier on the electrode surface and not from discharging the static charge on the electrode.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据