4.6 Article

Treatment-Dose LMWH versus Prophylactic/Intermediate Dose Heparins in High-Risk COVID-19 Inpatients: Rationale and Design of the HEP-COVID Trial

期刊

THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 121, 期 12, 页码 1684-1695

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/a-1475-2351

关键词

coronavirus disease-2019; venous thromboembolism; arterial thromboembolism; thromboprophylaxis; D-dimer

资金

  1. Broxmeyer Fellowship in Clinical Thrombosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The HEP-COVID trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of therapeutic-dose low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) compared to prophylactic-dose LMWH for preventing VTE, ATE, and all-cause mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The study design includes a randomized, multicenter approach with a focus on patients with elevated D-dimer levels.
Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with significant risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), arterial thromboembolism (ATE), and mortality particularly among hospitalized patients with critical illness and elevated D-dimer (Dd) levels. Conflicting data have yet to elucidate optimal thromboprophylaxis dosing. HEP-COVID (NCT04401293) is a phase 3, multicenter, pragmatic, prospective, randomized, pseudo-blinded, active control trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of therapeutic-dose low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) versus prophylactic-/intermediate-dose LMWH or unfractionated heparin (UFH) for prevention of a primary efficacy composite outcome of VTE, ATE, and all-cause mortality 30 +/- 2 days post-enrollment. Eligible patients have COVID-19 diagnosis by nasal swab or serologic testing, requirement for supplemental oxygen per investigator judgment, and Dd >4xupper limit of normal (ULN) or sepsis-induced coagulopathy score >= 4. Subjects are randomized to enoxaparin 1mg/kg subcutaneous (SQ)/two times a day (BID) (creatinine clearance [CrCl] >= 30mL/min) or 0.5mg/kg (CrCl 15-30mL/min) versus local institutional prophylactic regimens including (1) UFH up to 22,500IU (international unit) daily (divided BID or three times a day), (2) enoxaparin 30 and 40mg SQ QD (once daily) or BID, or (3) dalteparin 2,500IU or 5,000IU QD. The principal safety outcome is major bleeding. Events are adjudicated locally. Based on expected 40% relative risk reduction with treatment-dose compared with prophylactic-dose prophylaxis, 308 subjects will be enrolled (assuming 20% drop-out) to achieve 80% power. Distinguishing design features include an enriched population for the composite endpoint anchored on Dd >4xULN, stratification by intensive care unit (ICU) versus non-ICU, and the ability to capture asymptomatic proximal deep venous thrombosis via screening ultrasonography prior to discharge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据