4.5 Article

Comparison of thermal stability between dicyclopentadiene/hydrogenated dicyclopentadiene petroleum resin: Thermal decomposition characteristics, kinetics and evolved gas analysis by TGA/TG-MS

期刊

THERMOCHIMICA ACTA
卷 699, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2020.178853

关键词

Dicyclopentadiene petroleum resin; Thermal decomposition; Kinetics; Evolved gas analysis; Mechanism; TG-MS

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21878056, 31560241]
  2. Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Resource Processing and Process Intensification Technology [2019Z002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The thermal decomposition behavior and kinetics of dicyclopentadiene petroleum resin (DPR) and hydrogenated dicyclopentadiene petroleum resin (HDPR) were investigated, revealing that DPR is easier to decompose and undergo repolymerization at high temperature environment, forming a cross-linked structure, whereas HDPR has a lower thermal mass loss rate and higher thermal structure stability.
The thermal decomposition behavior and kinetics of dicyclopentadiene petroleum resin (DPR) and hydrogenated dicyclopentadiene petroleum resin (HDPR) were extensively explored. Both resins had two complex overlapping pyrolysis stages. The activation energy of DPR pyrolysis varied between 79-236 kJ mol(-1). The pyrolysis of DPR mainly contained depolymerization accompanied by repolymerization. The main product was cyclopentadiene. By contrast, the initial pyrolysis rate of HDPR was relatively slow. The activation energy of HDPR pyrolysis ranged from 67-217 kJ mol(-1). The pyrolysis process of HDPR is mainly ring opening and dehydrogenation reaction. Alkenes, alkynes and hydrogen were its main products. These results indicate DPR was easy to decompose and part of the molecule was changed to cross-linked reticular structure by the repolymerization at high temperature environment. Compared with that, HDPR has lower thermal mass loss rate and higher thermal structure stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据