4.7 Review

Breeding for drought and heat tolerance in wheat

期刊

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS
卷 134, 期 6, 页码 1753-1769

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-021-03795-1

关键词

Wheat; Heat; Drought; Breeding; Germplasm; Selection; Phenotyping

资金

  1. Foundation for Food and Agriculture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article evaluates various strategies used to enhance the heat and drought tolerance of wheat. While these strategies have expanded our knowledge of factors influencing yield under stress, not all have yielded the expected progress.
Key message Many approaches have been adopted to enhance the heat and drought tolerance of wheat with mixed success. An assessment of the relative merits of different strategies is presented. Wheat is the most widely grown crop globally and plays a key role in human nutrition. However, it is grown in environments that are prone to heat and drought stress, resulting in severely reduced yield in some seasons. Increased climate variability is expected to have a particularly adverse effect of wheat production. Breeding for stable yield across both good and bad seasons while maintaining high yield under optimal conditions is a high priority for most wheat breeding programs and has been a focus of research activities. Multiple strategies have been explored to enhance the heat and drought tolerance of wheat including extensive genetic analysis and modify the expression of genes involved in stress responses, targeting specific physiological traits and direct selection under a range of stress scenarios. These approaches have been combined with improvements in phenotyping, the development of genetic and genomic resources, and extended screening and analysis techniques. The results have greatly expanded our knowledge and understanding of the factors that influence yield under stress, but not all have delivered the hoped-for progress. Here, we provide an overview of the different strategies and an assessment of the most promising approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据