4.6 Article

Machine learning analyses of automated performance metrics during granular sub-stitch phases predict surgeon experience

期刊

SURGERY
卷 169, 期 5, 页码 1245-1249

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.09.020

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health [K23EB026493]
  2. Intuitive Surgical Clinical Research Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Automated performance metrics during vesico-urethral anastomosis can accurately distinguish surgeon expertise, with sub-stitch level measurements providing more accurate classification than summary metrics over whole stitches.
Automated performance metrics objectively measure surgeon performance during a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Machine learning has demonstrated that automated performance metrics, especially during the vesico-urethral anastomosis of the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, are predictive of long-term outcomes such as continence recovery time. This study focuses on automated performance metrics during the vesico-urethral anastomosis, specifically on stitch versus sub-stitch levels, to distinguish surgeon experience. During the vesico-urethral anastomosis, automated performance metrics, recorded by a systems data recorder (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), were reported for each overall stitch (C(tota)l) and its individual components: needle handling/targeting (C-1), needle driving (C-2), and suture cinching (C-3) (Fig 1, A). These metrics were organized into three datasets (GlobalSet [whole stitch], RowSet [independent sub-stitches], and ColumnSet [associated sub-stitches] (Fig 1, B) and applied to three machine learning models (AdaBoost, gradient boosting, and random forest) to solve two classifications tasks: experts (>= 100 cases) versus novices (<100 cases) and ordinary experts (>= 100 and <2,000 cases) versus super experts (>= 2,000 cases). Classification accuracy was determined using analysis of variance. Input features were evaluated through a Jaccard index. From 68 vesico-urethral anastomoses, we analyzed 1,570 stitches broken down into 4,708 sub-stitches. For both classification tasks, ColumnSet best distinguished experts (n = 8) versus novices (n = 9) and ordinary experts (n = 5) versus super experts (n = 3) at an accuracy of 0.774 and 0.844, respectively. Feature ranking highlighted Endowrist articulation and needle handling/targeting as most important in classifica-tion. Surgeon performance measured by automated performance metrics on a granular sub-stitch level more accurately distinguishes expertise when compared with summary automated performance metrics over whole stitches. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据