4.7 Article

Structure-based modeling and dynamics of MurM, a Streptococcus pneumoniae penicillin resistance determinant present at the cytoplasmic membrane

期刊

STRUCTURE
卷 29, 期 7, 页码 731-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2021.03.001

关键词

-

资金

  1. Midlands Integrative Biosciences Training Partnership (MIBTP) BBSRC grant [BB/J014532/1]
  2. Center for Doctoral Training in Theory and Modeling in Chemical Sciences (TMCS DTC) EPSRC grant [EP/L015722/1]
  3. MRC [G1100127, G0400848, MR/N002679/1]
  4. BBSRC [BB/N003241/1]
  5. BBSRC [BB/N003241/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [G1100127] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study explored the interaction between MurM protein and membrane phospholipids, revealing that the activity of MurM is regulated by specific phospholipids. The spatial association of pneumococcal membrane phospholipids with MurM activity may play a critical role in the expression of penicillin resistance.
Branched Lipid II, required for the formation of indirectly crosslinked peptidoglycan, is generated by MurM, a protein essential for high-level penicillin resistance in the human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae. We have solved the X-ray crystal structure of Staphylococcus aureus FemX, an isofunctional homolog, and have used this as a template to generate a MurM homology model. Using this model, we perform molecular docking and molecular dynamics to examine the interaction of MurM with the phospholipid bilayer and the membrane-embedded Lipid II substrate. Our model suggests that MurM is associated with the major membrane phospholipid cardiolipin, and experimental evidence confirms that the activity of MurM is enhanced by this phospholipid and inhibited by its direct precursor phosphatidylglycerol. The spatial association of pneumococcal membrane phospholipids and their impact on MurM activity may therefore be critical to the final architecture of peptidoglycan and the expression of clinically relevant penicillin resistance in this pathogen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据