4.5 Article

Hierarchical Bayesian clustering design of multiple biomarker subgroups (HCOMBS)

期刊

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
卷 40, 期 12, 页码 2893-2921

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sim.8946

关键词

adaptive design; biomarker; hierarchical Bayesian model; master protocol; single‐ arm phase II; subgroup identification; umbrella trial

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HCOMBS is a hierarchical Bayesian clustering design for multiple biomarker subgroups, aimed at reducing sample size, differentiating effect sizes, and controlling operating characteristics. Compared to Simon's Optimal two-stage design, simulations show that HCOMBS requires fewer participants per treatment arm with better controlled family-wise error rate and desirable power.
Given the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) acceptance of master protocol designs in recent guidance documents, the oncology field is rapidly moving to address the paradigm shift to molecular subtype focused studies. Identifying new marker-based treatments requires new methodologies to address the growing demand to conduct clinical trials in smaller molecular subpopulations, identify effective treatment and marker interactions, and control for false positives. We introduce our methodology, Hierarchical Bayesian Clustering Design of Multiple Biomarker Subgroups (HCOMBS), a two-stage umbrella Phase II design with effect size clustering and information borrowing across multiple biomarker-treatment pairs. HCOMBS was designed to reduce required sample size, differentiate between varying effect sizes, and control for operating characteristics in the multi-arm setting. When compared to independently applied Simon's Optimal two-stage design, we showed through simulations that HCOMBS required less participants per treatment arm with a well-controlled family-wise error rate and desirable marginal power. Additionally, HCOMBS features a statistical approach that simultaneously conducts clustering and hypothesis testing in one step. We also applied the proposed design on the alliance brain metastases umbrella trial.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据