4.5 Article

A robust and efficient algorithm to find profile likelihood confidence intervals

期刊

STATISTICS AND COMPUTING
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11222-021-10012-y

关键词

Computer algorithm; Constrained optimization; Parameter estimation; Estimability; Identifiability

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study presents a trust-region approach to compute profile likelihood confidence intervals, which achieves higher success rates and is among the quickest methods, making it applicable in many scenarios where earlier approaches are unreliable.
Profile likelihood confidence intervals are a robust alternative to Wald's method if the asymptotic properties of the maximum likelihood estimator are not met. However, the constrained optimization problem defining profile likelihood confidence intervals can be difficult to solve in these situations, because the likelihood function may exhibit unfavorable properties. As a result, existing methods may be inefficient and yield misleading results. In this paper, we address this problem by computing profile likelihood confidence intervals via a trust-region approach, where steps computed based on local approximations are constrained to regions where these approximations are sufficiently precise. As our algorithm also accounts for numerical issues arising if the likelihood function is strongly non-linear or parameters are not estimable, the method is applicable in many scenarios where earlier approaches are shown to be unreliable. To demonstrate its potential in applications, we apply our algorithm to benchmark problems and compare it with 6 existing approaches to compute profile likelihood confidence intervals. Our algorithm consistently achieved higher success rates than any competitor while also being among the quickest methods. As our algorithm can be applied to compute both confidence intervals of parameters and model predictions, it is useful in a wide range of scenarios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据