4.6 Review

Spinal metastases 2021: a review of the current state of the art and future directions

期刊

SPINE JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 9, 页码 1414-1429

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.04.012

关键词

Spinal metastases; Decision making; Prognostic tools; Prediction models; Radiation therapy; Chemotherapy; Immunotherapy; Spine surgery; SBRT; Ablation; Cement augmentation; MIS; Separation surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spinal metastases are becoming a growing societal health burden due to advancements in systemic therapy. Treatment options are expanding to include minimally invasive technologies and non-operative interventions, leading to a complex decision-making process that relies on multidisciplinary collaboration.
Spinal metastases are an increasing societal health burden secondary to improvements in systemic therapy. Estimates indicate that 100,000 or more people have symptomatic spine metastases requiring management. While open surgery and external beam radiotherapy have been the pillars of treatment, there is growing interest in more minimally invasive technologies (eg separation surgery) and non-operative interventions (eg percutaneous cementoplasty, stereotactic radiosurgery). The great expansion of these alternatives to open surgery and the prevalence of adjuvant therapeutic options means that treatment decision making is now complex and reliant upon multidisciplinary collaboration. To help facilitate construction of care plans that meet patient goals and expectations, clinical decision aids and prognostic scores have been developed. These have been shown to have superior predictive value relative to more classic prediction models and may become an increasingly important aspect of the clinical practice of spinal oncology. Here we overview current therapeutic advances in the management of spine metastases and highlight emerging areas for research. Given the rapid advancements in surgical technologies and adjuvants, the field is likely to undergo further transformative changes in the coming decade. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据