4.7 Article

Highly sensitive fluorescent probe for selective detection of hypochlorite ions using nitrogen-fluorine co-doped carbon nanodots

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2020.119231

关键词

Carbon nanodots; Hypochlorite ions; Fluorescent probe; Nitrogen-fluorine co-doping

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21904056]
  2. National Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2017J01420, 2018H0030, 2018J05022]
  3. Education Bureau of Fujian Province [JZ160453]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel fluorescent probe was developed for the detection of ClO- ions with high sensitivity and selectivity in aqueous media. This nitrogen-fluorine co-doped nanodot probe showed fast quenching response and low limit of detection, making it promising for the analysis of pollutants.
Hypochlorite ions (ClO-) are widely used in bleaching agents and disinfectants. However, high concentrations of chloride species are harmful to human health. Therefore, effective methods for the detection of ClOions are required. In this study, using 4-fluorophthalic acid and glycine, nitrogen-fluorine codoped carbon nanodots (N,F-CDs) were synthesized by one-pot hydrothermal synthesis for use as a fluorescent probe for the fluorometric detection of ClOin aqueous media, based on the inhibition of n -> pi* transitions. The excitation and emission peak centers of the N,F-CDs are at 387 and 545 nm, respectively. The N,F-CDs show a fast quenching response (<1 min) for ClO and can be used in a wide pH range (pH 4- 13). Under optimal conditions, the fluorescence intensity decreased with increase in the ClOconcentra tionfrom 0 to 35 mu M, anda low limit of detection (9.6 nM) was achieved. This probe possesses excellent selectivity and high sensitivity and was used to analyze standardized samples of piped water, achieving a satisfactory recovery. Thus, this nitrogen-fluorine co-doped nanodot probe is promising for the detection of pollutants. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据