4.7 Article

Carrier losses in non-geminate charge-transferred states of nonfullerene acceptor-based organic solar cells

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2020.119227

关键词

Nonfullerene acceptor-based organic solar cells; Ultrafast spectroscopy; Charge-transferred state

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [NRF-2017R1D1A1B03030669]
  2. GIST Research Institute (GRI) APRI - GIST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identified that by optimizing the morphology of BHJ and using a processing additive during the fabrication of the composite film, the carrier recombination loss in the CT state can be decreased, leading to improved power conversion efficiencies in nonfullerene-based organic solar cells.
To understand the current limitations of nonfullerene-based organic solar cells (OSCs), the early-time dynamics of the carrier generation in the high performance bulk heterojunction (BHJ) blend of a semiconducting polymer, PBDB-T, and the low bandgap nonfullerene acceptor, ITIC-m, are investigated. After photoexcitation, photo-induced excitons are separated through the ultrafast (-200 fs) electron transfer process from PBDB-T to ITIC-m and through the fast (3-6 ps) hole transfer process from ITIC-m to PBDB-T. However, a part of the separated charges recombines in the non-geminate (long-range) charge-transferred (CT) states. The yield of mobile carriers is correspondingly decreased by recombination in the CT states. In our measurements, the carrier recombination loss in the CT state is decreased by optimizing the BHJ morphology, especially for showing better electron mobility using a processing additive (1,8-diiodooctane) during the fabrication of the composite film, as evidenced by the decreased CT band intensity at-30 ps and the increased polaron band intensity, which eventually improve power conversion efficiencies (PCEs). (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据