4.6 Article

A feature subset selection algorithm based on equal interval division and three-way interaction information

期刊

SOFT COMPUTING
卷 25, 期 13, 页码 8785-8795

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-021-05800-7

关键词

Three-way interaction information; Equal interval division; Symmetric uncertainty; Feature subset selection; Feature selection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61771334]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper proposes a new feature subset selection algorithm based on equal interval division and three-way interaction information to address the issues existing in some current algorithms. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can achieve better feature selection performance.
Some existing feature subset selection algorithms use only one metric, such as symmetric uncertainty, to evaluate redundant features. These algorithms have the problem that some relevant features are considered as redundant and removed. To solve the problem, this paper proposes a feature subset selection algorithm based on equal interval division and three-way interaction information. Symmetric uncertainty between each feature and the class label is first calculated and compared with zero, and irrelevant features are removed. Then, symmetric uncertainty between features is calculated and compared with symmetric uncertainty between features and the class label. The method of equal interval division and ranking is adopted to process symmetric uncertainty between features and the class label as well as symmetric uncertainty between features, and these processed parts are then compared. Three-way interaction information among features and the class label is calculated and compared with zero. The three results of the comparisons are employed to remove redundant features. To validate the performance, the proposed algorithm is compared with several feature subset selection algorithms. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can achieve better feature selection performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据