4.4 Article

Parametric and kinetic study of supercritical carbon dioxide extraction on sinensetin from Orthosiphon stamineus Benth. leaves

期刊

SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 57, 期 3, 页码 444-453

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01496395.2021.1917613

关键词

Orthosiphon stamineus; supercritical carbon dioxide; sinensetin; extraction rate

资金

  1. Universiti Teknologi Malasya [R.J130000.7851.4F997, R.J130000.7751.4J395]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sinensetin, a rare polymethoxyflavone with strong anti-angiogenesis activity, was successfully extracted from Orthosiphon stamineus leaves using supercritical carbon dioxide extraction. The study investigated the optimal extraction conditions and evaluated the kinetic behavior of sinensetin using two models.
Sinensetin is a rare polymethoxyflavone that possesses strong anti-angiogenesis activity that can be obtained from Orthosiphon stamineus (O. stamineus) leaves. In this study, supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) extraction was used to improve sinensetin recovery from O. stamineus leaves. The effect of mean particle size (400-550, 550-650 and 650-750 mu m), modifier ratio (0, 5 and 10%, v/v), flow rate (3, 4 and 5 mL/min), temperature (40, 60 and 80 degrees C) and pressure (10, 20 and 30 MPa) on the concentration of sinensetin and determine its extraction rate were investigated. Two models, viz. Patricelli and Peleg were used to evaluate the kinetic behavior of sinensetin in the SC-CO2 system. Results showed that the highest concentration of sinensetin was successfully extracted at 550-650 mu m, 10% (v/v), 5 mL/min, 80 degrees C and 10 MPa. Also, the kinetic profile of sinensetin was well correlated with Patricelli and Peleg models with a low percentage average absolute relative deviation (AARD%) and a high coefficient of determination (R-2) of 0.974, respectively. Thus, the fastest extraction rate of sinensetin was obtained at 9.039 x 10(-3) mg/g min(-1) using the Patricelli model and 8.694 x 10(-3) mg/g min(-1) using the Peleg model at 40 degrees C and 30 MPa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据