4.7 Article

Simple synthesis of BiOAc/BiOBr heterojunction composites for the efficient photocatalytic removal of organic pollutants

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.118286

关键词

BiOAc; BiOBr; Heterojunction; Photocatalytic degradation; Composite

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M632783]
  2. Technology Department of the Henan Science and Technology Fund Project [202102310603]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province of China [202300410244]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel p-n BiOAc/BiOBr heterojunction composite was successfully synthesized, showing significantly enhanced photocatalytic activity due to the heterojunction electric field formed at the interface. The main active species identified were h(+) and center dot O-2(-), which effectively degraded Rhodamine B and Ciprofloxacin under LED light irradiation. The study proposed a potential photocatalytic mechanism for the BiOAc/BiOBr composites.
Given that the formation of p-n heterojunctions between semiconductors could effectively improve the activities of catalysts, a novel p-n BiOAc/BiOBr heterojunction composite was successfully synthesized. The introduction of BiOAc improved the morphology of the BiOBr and formed flower-like nanostructured BiOAc/BiOBr composites. Rhodamine B (RhB) was degraded by similar to 98% under 5 W LED light irradiation (lambda > 390 nm) within 15 min on 10 wt% BiOAc/BiOBr samples, which was much higher than that on pure BiOBr (similar to 70%). Under the same conditions, 75% and 50% of Ciprofloxacin (CIP) was degraded within 120 min on 10 wt% BiOAc/BiOBr and BiOBr, respectively. This enhanced photocatalytic activity was attributed to the existence of a heterojunction electric field that was formed at the BiOAc/BiOBr interface. The dominant active species in the photocatalytic system were identified as h(+) and center dot O-2(-) via radical trapping experiments and ESR analysis. Finally, a potential photocatalytic mechanism over the BiOAc/BiOBr composites was proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据