4.7 Article

LL37 loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC): A new strategy for the topical treatment of chronic wounds

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.04.006

关键词

LL37; Antimicrobial peptide; Lipid nanoparticles; NLC (nanostructured lipid carriers); Chronic wounds

资金

  1. Basque Government [IT-428-10, IT-528-10]
  2. ERDF
  3. ESF
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (INNPACTO) [IPT-2012-0602-300000]
  5. University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU [UFI11/32]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The LL37 is a human antimicrobial peptide which not only has a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity, but it has also been proved to modulate wound healing by participating in angiogenesis, epithelial cell migration and proliferation, and immune response. In this work, LL37 has been encapsulated in nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs), produced by the melt-emulsification method, in order to improve its effectiveness. The characterisation of the NLC-LL37 showed a mean size of 270 nm, a zeta potential of -26 mV and an encapsulation efficiency of 96.4%. The cytotoxicity assay performed in Human Foreskin Fibroblasts demonstrated that the NLC-LL37 did not affect cell viability. Moreover, the in vitro bioactivity assay evidenced that the peptide remained active after the encapsulation, since the NLC-LL37 reversed the activation of the macrophages induced by LPS in the same way as the LL37 in solution. In addition, the in vitro antimicrobial assay revealed the NLC-LL37 activity against Escherichia coli. The effectiveness of the nanoparticles was assessed in a full thickness wound model in db/db mice. The data demonstrated that NLC-LL37 significantly improved healing compared to the same concentration of the LL37 solution in terms of wound closure, reepithelisation grade and restoration of the inflammatory process. Overall, these findings suggest a promising potential of the NLC-LL37 formulation for chronic wound healing. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据