4.7 Article

Red fluorescent carbon dots for tetracycline antibiotics and pH discrimination from aggregation-induced emission mechanism

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 332, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2021.129513

关键词

Carbon dots; Turn-on; Tetracycline antibiotics; PH; Aggregation induced emission

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21874087and21575084]
  2. Scientific and Technologial Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions of Shanxi [2020L0006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Red fluorescent carbon dots have been developed for the detection of pH and tetracycline antibiotics. These carbon dots have excellent performance and promising applications in detecting tetracyclines and pH in milk products.
Red fluorescent carbon dots (R-CDs) have been developed for the turn-on determination of pH and tetracycline antibiotics (TCs), including tetracycline (TC), oxytetracycline (OTC), and chlortetracycline (CTC). The CDs were fabricated via one-pot hydrothermal treatment using neutral red and thiourea as precursors. As-obtained CDs possess excellent photobleaching resistance, good photostability and biocompatibility, and low cytotoxicity. Importantly, the CDs displayed a remarkable emission enhancement upon the introduction of TCs based on aggregation induced emission enhancement (AIEE) mechanism. For TC, OTC, and CTC, the linear correlation detection ranges are 3 - 35 mu M, 2 - 50 mu M, and 5 - 50 mu M, respectively, and the limit of detections are 12, 23, and 25 nM, respectively. The proposed method has been successfully applied to the determination of TCs in milk products. Furthermore, the CDs exhibited a distinct H+-sensitive feature, and have been used to construct fluorescent pH sensor in linear range of 6.0-8.0 with a pKa of 7.08. Notably, the nanosensor has been also extended to monitor TCs and pH in cellular systems, demonstrating the proposed methodology presents promising biosensing application prospect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据