4.6 Article

Charge Sharing and Charge Loss in High-Flux Capable Pixelated CdZnTe Detectors

期刊

SENSORS
卷 21, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21093260

关键词

CdZnTe; pixel detector; X-ray detector; charge sharing; charge loss

资金

  1. University of Leicester LISEO studentship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Detectors made with HF-CdZnTe material have shown promising results in mitigating polarization effects, likely due to improved crystal quality and hole carrier transport. Charge sharing events in a 2 mm thick pixelated HF-CdZnTe detector exhibited minimal charge loss, resulting in good spectral resolution.
Cadmium zinc telluride (CdZnTe) detectors are known to suffer from polarization effects under high photon flux due to poor hole transport in the crystal material. This has led to the development of a high-flux capable CdZnTe material (HF-CdZnTe). Detectors with the HF-CdZnTe material have shown promising results at mitigating the onset of the polarization phenomenon, likely linked to improved crystal quality and hole carrier transport. Better hole transport will have an impact on charge collection, particularly in pixelated detector designs and thick sensors (>1 mm). In this paper, the presence of charge sharing and the magnitude of charge loss were calculated for a 2 mm thick pixelated HF-CdZnTe detector with 250 mu m pixel pitch and 25 mu m pixel gaps, bonded to the STFC HEXITEC ASIC. Results are compared with a CdTe detector as a reference point and supported with simulations from a Monte-Carlo detector model. Charge sharing events showed minimal charge loss in the HF-CdZnTe, resulting in a spectral resolution of 1.63 +/- 0.08 keV Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) for bipixel charge sharing events at 59.5 keV. Depth of interaction effects were shown to influence charge loss in shared events. The performance is discussed in relation to the improved hole transport of HF-CdZnTe and comparison with simulated results provided evidence of a uniform electric field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据