4.6 Article

Analysis of large-scale tablet coating: Modeling, simulation and experiments

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2015.12.022

关键词

DEM; Tablet coating; Industrial scale simulation; GPU simulation

资金

  1. Austrian COMET Program under the Austrian Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology (BMVIT)
  2. Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth (BMWFJ)
  3. State of Styria (Styrian Funding Agency SFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work concerns a tablet coating process in an industrial-scale drum coater. We set up a full-scale Design of Simulation Experiment (DoSE) using the Discrete Element Method (DEM) to investigate the influence of various process parameters (the spray rate, the number of nozzles, the rotation rate and the drum load) on the coefficient of inter-tablet coating variation (c(v,inter)). The coater was filled with up to 290 kg of material, which is equivalent to 1,028,369 tablets. To mimic the tablet shape, the glued sphere approach was followed, and each modeled tablet consisted of eight spheres. We simulated the process via the eXtended Particle System (XPS), proving that it is possible to accurately simulate the tablet coating process on the industrial scale. The process time required to reach a uniform tablet coating was extrapolated based on the simulated data and was in good agreement with experimental results. The results are provided at various levels of details, from thorough investigation of the influence that the process parameters have on the c(v,inter) and the amount of tablets that visit the spray zone during the simulated 90 s to the velocity in the spray zone and the spray and bed cycle time. It was found that increasing the number of nozzles and decreasing the spray rate had the highest influence on the c(v,inter). Although increasing the drum load and the rotation rate increased the tablet velocity, it did not have a relevant influence on the cv, inter and the process time. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据