4.6 Article

Exosomes and extracellular vesicles: Rethinking the essential values in cancer biology

期刊

SEMINARS IN CANCER BIOLOGY
卷 74, 期 -, 页码 79-91

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.03.032

关键词

Extracellular vesicles; Exosomes; Metastasis; Oncogenesis; Heterogeneity

类别

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [JP20cm0106402, 20ck0106630h0001]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [119H03797, 20K22806]
  3. Program for Pro-moting the Enhancement of Research Universities
  4. Aichi Cancer Research Foundation
  5. Yokoyama Foundation for Clinical Pharmacology grant [TRY-2014]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20K22806] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes recent studies on EVs from the perspective of EV heterogeneity and highlights their role in various steps from oncogenic to metastatic processes. Recognizing EV subtypes is crucial for identifying pathways affected by EVs and targeting specific subtypes in therapeutic approaches or liquid biopsies.
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) such as exosomes are released by all living cells and contain diverse bioactive molecules, including nucleic acids, proteins, lipids, and metabolites. Accumulating evidence of EV-related functions has revealed that these tiny vesicles can mediate specific cell-to-cell communication. Within the tumor microenvironment, diverse cells are actively interacting with their surroundings via EVs facilitating tumor malignancy by regulating malignant cascades including angiogenesis, immune modulation, and metastasis. This review summarizes the recent studies of fundamental understandings of EVs from the aspect of EV heterogeneity and highlights the role of EVs in the various steps from oncogenic to metastatic processes. The recognition of EV subtypes is necessary to identify which pathways can be affected by EVs and which subtypes can be targeted in therapeutic approaches or liquid biopsies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据