4.7 Article

Bandgap engineering in SrTiO3 thin films by electronic excitations: A synchrotron-based spectroscopic study

期刊

SCRIPTA MATERIALIA
卷 195, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.113725

关键词

Strontium titanate; Bandgap engineering; X-ray absorption spectroscopy; Synchrotron X-ray diffraction; Swift heavy ion irradiation

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Delhi, India
  2. Elettra Sincrotrone Trieste, Italy
  3. SERB [EMR/2016/002437]
  4. UGC Delhi, India
  5. Department of Science and Technology, India [SR/NM/Z-07/2015]
  6. MoST [MoST 107-2112-M-032-004-MY3]
  7. [MoST 108-2112-M-213-007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the tuning of the optical bandgap of SrTiO3 films by electronic excitations induced by 125 MeV Ag ions. The X-ray diffraction pattern and X-ray absorption spectra (XAS) reveal significant changes in the local electronic structures, particularly in the distortion of TiO6 octahedra and the ratio of area under t(2g)/e(g). These findings provide insights into the role of structural properties and electronic structures in bandgap tuning.
Engineering the optical bandgap of metal oxides is essential for optoelectronic and photocatalytic applications. The present study reports the application of electronic excitations, induced by 125 MeV Ag ions, in tuning the bandgap of SrTiO3 films in the range of 2.93-3.78 eV and their correlation with the synchrotron-based X-ray diffraction pattern and X-ray absorption spectra (XAS). The pre-edge spectral features in the XAS at Ti K-edge show significant variation in the valence state implying the role of electronic excitations in modifying the local electronic structures mainly the distortion in the TiO6 octahedra and the ratio of area under t(2g)/e(g). This study gives an insight about the role of structural properties and electronic structures in bandgap tuning. (C) 2021 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据