4.5 Article

An NLP-based citation reason analysis using CCRO

期刊

SCIENTOMETRICS
卷 126, 期 6, 页码 4769-4791

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-03955-6

关键词

NLP-based citation analysis; Qualitative research evaluation; Text classification; Ontology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent scientific advancements, Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing play a key role in classifying documents and extracting information. This research focuses on understanding the reasons behind citations using an ontology-based approach, with an emphasis on sentiment analysis and collaborative meanings. By annotating citation texts and automatically extracting reasons, the study calculates accuracy in both publicly available and manually curated corpora.
In recent scientific advances, Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing are the major contributors to classifying documents and extracting information. Classifying citations in different classes have gathered a lot of attention due to the large volume of citations available in different digital libraries. Typical citation classification uses sentiment analysis, where various techniques are applied to citations texts to mainly classify them in Positive, Negative and Neutral sentiments. However, there can be innumerable reasons why an author selects another research for citation. Citations' Context and Reasons Ontology-CCRO uses a clear scientific method to articulate eight basic reasons for citing by using an iterative process of sentiment analysis, collaborative meanings, and experts' opinions. Using CCRO, this research paper adopts an ontology-based approach to extract citation's reasons and instantiate ontology classes and properties on two different corpora of citation sentences. One corpus of citation sentences is a publicly available dataset, while the other is our own manually curated. The process uses a two-step approach. The first part is an interface to manually annotate each citation text in the selected corpora on CCRO properties. A team of carefully selected annotators has annotated each citation to achieve a high inter-annotator agreement. The second part focuses on the automatic extraction of these reasons. Using Natural Language Processing, Mapping Graph, and Reporting Verb in a citation sentence, citation's reason is extracted and mapped onto a CCRO property. After comparing both manual and automatic mapping, accuracy is calculated. Based on experiments and results, accuracy is calculated for both publicly available and own corpora of citation sentences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据