4.7 Article

Variation of amino acids in Prunus persica cultivars leaves with regard to leaf age

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 281, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110001

关键词

Leaf age; Peach; Amino acid source; Leaf valorization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the changes in amino acid profiles in peach leaves with respect to leaf age, finding that young leaves contained higher amounts of most amino acids compared to mature leaves, with similar amino acid contents across different cultivars. The results suggest that peach leaves are a rich source of amino acids and warrant further exploration for potential applications in various industries.
The central role of amino acids in cellular and plant physiology is of current interest. Information related to the implication of amino acids during leaf age is still scarce. This study examined changes in the profile of amino acids extracted from leaves of five peach cultivars ('Early Maycrest', 'Sweet Cap', 'O'Henry', 'Flordastar', and 'Rubirich') grown in the region of Sidi Bouzid, central-western Tunisia with respect to leaf age. Seventeen amino acids, aspartic acid (Asp), serine (Ser), glycine (Gly), proline (Pro), tyrosine (Tyr), valine (Val), methionine (Met), cysteine (Cys), tryptophan (Trp), leucine (Leu), phenylalanine (Phe), isoleucine (Ile), lysine (Lys), glutamic acid (Glu), arginine (Arg), alanine (Ala), and histidine (His) were quantified. Significant variations were observed for Asp, Glu, Ser, Gly, Ala + Arg, Pro, Val, Ile + Trp, and Lys in relation to the leaf age. On average, young leaves (106.48-142.18 mg g(-1) DW) contained higher amounts of most amino acids than mature leaves (97.33-110.27 mg g(-1) DW). Approximately identical contents of amino acids were found in the different cultivars. In conclusion, P. persica leaves are a very rich source of amino acids (about 10% DW), and therefore deserves further investigation for their potential application in the nutraceutical, food, feed, and pharmaceutical industries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据