4.8 Article

T cell and antibody kinetics delineate SARS-CoV-2 peptides mediating long-term immune responses in COVID-19 convalescent individuals

期刊

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 13, 期 590, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abf7517

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) [FKZ:01KI20130]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [WA 4608/1-2]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC2180-390900677]
  4. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)
  5. Wilhelm Sander Stiftung [2016.177.2]
  6. Jose Carreras Leukamie-Stiftung [DJCLS 05 R/2017]
  7. Fortune Program of the University of Tubingen [2451-0-0, 2581-0-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that antibody responses in COVID-19 convalescent individuals decreased or remained stable within 6 months, while T cell responses showed a robust increase. T cell responses included key epitopes that mediate long-term SARS-CoV-2 immunity.
Long-term immunological memory to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is crucial for the development of population-level immunity, which is the aim of vaccination approaches. Reports on rapidly decreasing antibody titers have led to questions regarding the efficacy of humoral immunity alone. The relevance of T cell memory after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unclear. Here, we investigated SARS-CoV-2 antibody and T cell responses in matched samples of COVID-19 convalescent individuals up to 6 months after infection. Longitudinal analysis revealed decreasing and stable spike- and nucleocapsid-specific antibody responses, respectively. In contrast, functional T cell responses remained robust, and even increased, in both frequency and intensity. Single peptide mapping of T cell diversity over time identified open reading frame-independent, dominant T cell epitopes mediating longterm SARS-CoV-2 T cell responses. Identification of these epitopes may be fundamental for COVID-19 vaccine design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据