4.8 Article

An RNA aptamer restores defective bone growth in FGFR3-related skeletal dysplasia in mice

期刊

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 13, 期 592, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aba4226

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (National Program of Sustainability II projects) [LQ1605, LQ1601, LTAUSA19030, CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000460]
  3. Agency for Healthcare Research of the Czech Republic [NV18-08-00567]
  4. Czech Science Foundation [GA17-09525S, GA19-20123S]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that RBM-007 can effectively inhibit FGFR3 signaling, repair detrimental effects on cartilage and skeletal development, providing a potential therapeutic approach for achondroplasia and other FGFR3-related skeletal dysplasias.
Achondroplasia is the most prevalent genetic form of dwarfism in humans and is caused by activating mutations in FGFR3 tyrosine kinase. The clinical need for a safe and effective inhibitor of FGFR3 is unmet, leaving achondroplasia currently incurable. Here, we evaluated RBM-007, an RNA aptamer previously developed to neutralize the FGFR3 ligand FGF2, for its activity against FGFR3. In cultured rat chondrocytes or mouse embryonal tibia organ culture, RBM-007 rescued the proliferation arrest, degradation of cartilaginous extracellular matrix, premature senescence, and impaired hypertrophic differentiation induced by FGFR3 signaling. In cartilage xenografts derived from induced pluripotent stem cells from individuals with achondroplasia, RBM-007 rescued impaired chondrocyte differentiation and maturation. When delivered by subcutaneous injection, RBM-007 restored defective skeletal growth in a mouse model of achondroplasia. We thus demonstrate a ligand-trap concept of targeting the cartilage FGFR3 and delineate a potential therapeutic approach for achondroplasia and other FGFR3-related skeletal dysplasias.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据