4.7 Article

Prenatal exposure to a wide range of environmental chemicals and child behaviour between 3 and 7 years of age - An exposome-based approach in 5 European cohorts

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 763, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144115

关键词

Internal exposome; Prenatal exposure; Child behaviour; Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; Birth cohort

资金

  1. French National Research Agency [ANR-15-IDEX-02]
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [CPI119/00015]
  3. European Community [308333]
  4. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  5. CIBERESP
  6. European Social Fund Investing in your future
  7. Generalitat de Catalunya-CIRIT (Spain)
  8. Lithuanian Agency for Science Innovation and Technology [6-04-2014-31V-66]
  9. Greek Ministry of Health and Social Solidarity (Program of Prevention of obesity and neurodevelopmental disorders in preschool children, in Heraklion district, Crete, Greece: 2011-2014: Rhea Plus: Primary Prevention Program of Environmental Risk Factors
  10. Wellcome Trust (UK) [WT101597MA]
  11. Foundation for Medical Research (FRM)
  12. Inserm
  13. French Institute for Public Health Research (IReSP)
  14. Nestle
  15. French Ministry of Social Affairs and Health
  16. French National Research Agency (ANR)
  17. Universite Paris-Sud
  18. French Institute for Public Health Surveillance (InVS)
  19. French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health Safety (ANSES)
  20. Mutuelle generale de ['Education nationale (MGEN)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found deleterious effects of prenatal exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) and mono-n-butyl phthalate (MnBP) on child behavior. Other associations should be interpreted cautiously as they were not consistent with previous studies or have not been extensively studied.
Background: Studies looking at associations between environmental chemicals and child behaviour usually consider only one exposure or family of exposures. Objective: This study explores associations between prenatal exposure to a wide range of environmental chemicals and child behaviour. Methods: We studied 703 mother-child pairs from five European cohorts recruited in 2003-2009 We assessed 47 exposure biomarkers from eight chemical exposure families in maternal blood or urine collected during pregnancy. We used the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to evaluate child behaviour between three and seven years of age. We assessed associations of SDQ scores with exposures using an adjusted least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) considering all exposures simultaneously and an adjusted exposome-wide association study (ExWAS) considering each exposure independently. Results: LASSO selected only copper (Cu) as associated with externalizing behaviour. In the ExWAS, bisphenol A [BPA, incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.06, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 1.01; 1.12] and mono-n-butyl phthalate (MnBP, IRR: 1.06, 95%CI: 1.00; 1.13) were associated with greater risk of externalizing behaviour problems. Cu (IRK: 0.90, 95%CI: 0.82; 0.98), perfluoroundecanoate (PFUnDA, IRR: 0.92, 95%CI: 0.84;0.99) and organochlorine compounds (OCs) were associated with lower risk of externalizing behaviour problems, however the associations with OCs were mainly seen among women with insufficient weight gain during pregnancy. Internalizing score worsen in association with exposure to diethyl thiophosphate (DETP, IRR: 1.11, 95%CI: 1.00;124) but the effect was driven by the smallest cohort. Internalizing score improved with increased concentration of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS, IRR: 0.92, 95%CI: 0.85;1.00), however the association was driven by the two smallest cohorts with the lowest PFOS concentrations. Discussion: This study added evidence on deleterious effects of prenatal exposure to BPA and MnBP on child behaviour. Other associations should be interpreted cautiously since they were not consistent with previous studies or they have not been studied extensively. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据