4.8 Article

Incorporation of a nucleoside analog maps genome repair sites in postmitotic human neurons

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 372, 期 6537, 页码 91-+

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abb9032

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Heart Association (AHA)-Allen Initiative in Brain Health and Cognitive Impairment award through the AHA [19PABHI34610000]
  2. American Heart Association (AHA)-Allen Initiative in Brain Health and Cognitive Impairment award through Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group [19PABHI34610000]
  3. JPB Foundation
  4. Dolby Foundation
  5. Helmsley Charitable Trust
  6. NIH [AG056306, R01AG056511-02, DP5OD023071-03, P30 014195]
  7. Alzheimer's Association [AARF-17-504089]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurons, as the longest-lived cells in our bodies, lack DNA replication and rely on a limited repertoire of DNA repair mechanisms to maintain genome fidelity. Research has found that DNA repair in neurons is enriched at well-defined hotspots, which are associated with evolutionarily conserved elements of the human genome. These findings provide insights into the protection of genome integrity in the aging and disease of the nervous system.
Neurons are the longest-lived cells in our bodies and lack DNA replication, which makes them reliant on a limited repertoire of DNA repair mechanisms to maintain genome fidelity. These repair mechanisms decline with age, but we have limited knowledge of how genome instability emerges and what strategies neurons and other long-lived cells may have evolved to protect their genomes over the human life span. A targeted sequencing approach in human embryonic stem cell-induced neurons shows that, in neurons, DNA repair is enriched at well-defined hotspots that protect essential genes. These hotspots are enriched with histone H2A isoforms and RNA binding proteins and are associated with evolutionarily conserved elements of the human genome. These findings provide a basis for understanding genome integrity as it relates to aging and disease in the nervous system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据