4.3 Article

Why do parents refuse childhood vaccination? Reasons reported in Finland

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 50, 期 4, 页码 490-496

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/14034948211004323

关键词

Vaccination; immunization; vaccine hesitancy; vaccination refusal; parents; health perceptions; health practices

资金

  1. Emil Aaltonen Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article examines the reasons for parents in Finland partially or completely refusing childhood vaccination, with findings showing concerns about vaccine side effects, distrust in health officials and medical professionals, and support for alternative health practices. Loss of trust in medical and public health actors is identified as central to parents' questioning and refusal of vaccination. The adverse effects of the Pandemrix vaccine in 2009-2010 contributed to this distrust.
Aims: This article examines the reasons for partial and complete refusal of childhood vaccination as reported by parents in Finland. It analyzes perceptions and experiences central in vaccination decisions. Methods: The analysis is based on 38 in-depth interviews with Finnish parents who have refused all or several vaccines for their children. The interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Three categories of reasons were identified in the analysis: 1) risks and effects of vaccination - concern about and/or experiences of possible side-effects was the most important reason for avoiding vaccines; 2) distrust - participants did not trust vaccination recommendations made by health officials and medical professionals due to perceived bias in medical research, ties between health officials and the pharmaceutical industry, and personal experiences of (suspected) adverse effects and the way these concerns were received in healthcare institutions; 3) health perceptions and practices - parents supported their vaccination choices with complementary and alternative medicine treatments and alternative health understandings. Many stated that contracting vaccine-preventable illnesses would provide longer lasting and more 'natural' immunity than vaccination, and possibly other health benefits. Conclusions: A loss of trust in medical and public health actors was central to the process in which parents came to question, contest, and eventually refuse childhood vaccination. The adverse effects of the Pandemrix vaccine in 2009-2010 have been important in leading to distrust and contestation. Distrust may relate to personal experiences of (suspected) adverse effects or to broader concerns over the neutrality of health authorities and the trustworthiness of medical research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据