4.7 Article

Abatacept in monotherapy vs combined in interstitial lung disease of rheumatoid arthritis-multicentre study of 263 Caucasian patients

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 61, 期 1, 页码 299-308

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab317

关键词

rheumatoid arthritis; interstitial lung disease; abatacept; methotrexate; conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; high-resolution computed tomography; comorbidity

资金

  1. 'Lopez Albo' Post-Residency Programme by Servicio Cantabro de Salud (Cantabria), Spain
  2. RETICS Program (Instituto de Salud Carlos III - European Regional Development Fund) from 'Instituto de Salud Carlos III' (ISCIII) (Spain) [RD16/0012/0009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Caucasian individuals with RA-ILD, ABA in monotherapy or combined with MTX or other conventional DMARDs seems to be equally effective and safe. However, a CS-sparing effect is only observed with combined ABA.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of abatacept (ABA) in monotherapy (ABA(MONO)) vs combined ABA [ABA plus MTX (ABA(MTX)) or ABA plus non-MTX conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) (ABA(NON-MTX))] in RA patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) (RA-ILD). Methods This was a restrospective multicentre study of RA-ILD Caucasian patients treated with ABA. We analysed in the three groups (ABA(MONO), ABA(MTX), ABA(NON-MTX)) the following outcome variables: (i) dyspnoea; (ii) forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusion capacity of the lung for the carbon monoxide (DLCO); (iii) chest high-resolution CT (HRCT); (iv) DAS28-ESR; (v) CS-sparing effect; and (vi) ABA retention and side-effects. Differences between basal and final follow-up were evaluated. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess the differences between the three groups. Results We studied 263 RA-ILD patients (mean +/- s.d. age 64.6 +/- 10 years) [ABA(MONO) (n = 111), ABA(MTX) (n = 46) and ABA(NON-MTX) (n = 106)]. At baseline, ABA(MONO) patients were older (67 +/- 10 years) and took higher prednisone dose [10 (interquartile range 5-15) mg/day]. At that time, there were no statistically significant differences in sex, seropositivity, ILD patterns, FVC and DLCO, or disease duration. Following treatment, in all groups, most patients experienced stabilization or improvement in FVC, DLCO, dyspnoea and chest HRCT as well as improvement in DAS28-ESR. A statistically significant difference between basal and final follow-up was only found in CS-sparing effect in the group on combined ABA (ABA(MTX) or ABA(NON-MTX)). However, in the multivariable analysis, there were no differences in any outcome variables between the three groups. Conclusion In Caucasian individuals with RA-ILD, ABA in monotherapy or combined with MTX or with other conventional-DMARDs seems to be equally effective and safe. However, a CS-sparing effect is only observed with combined ABA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据