4.7 Article

Comparing cost-utility of DMARDs in autoantibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis patients

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 60, 期 12, 页码 5765-5774

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab251

关键词

RA; economic evaluation; cost-utility analysis; autoantigens and autoantibodies; QALY; healthcare and productivity costs; worker productivity

资金

  1. Pfizer bv [WI229707]
  2. Dutch Arthritis Society [16-3-101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the 1-year cost-effectiveness of three different initial treatment strategies in autoantibody-negative RA patients, with iHCQ showing the highest probability of cost-effectiveness and lower healthcare costs but higher productivity costs. However, further validation is needed.
Objectives: To evaluate the 1-year cost-effectiveness between three different initial treatment strategies in autoantibody-negative RA patients, according to 2010 criteria. Methods: For this analysis we selected all RA patients within the intermediate probability stratum of the treatment in the Rotterdam Early Arthritis Cohort (tREACH) trial. The tREACH had a treat-to-target approach, aiming for low DAS <2.4, and treatment adjustments could occur every 3 months. Initial treatment strategies consisted of MTX 25 mg/week (initial MTX, iMTX), iHCQ 400 mg/day or an oral glucocorticoids tapering scheme without DMARDs (iGCs). Data on quality-adjusted life-years, measured with the European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L), healthcare and productivity costs were used. Results: Average quality-adjusted life-years (S.D.), for iMTX, iHCQ and iGCs were respectively 0.71 (0.14), 0.73 (0.14) and 0.71 (0.15). The average total costs (S.D.) for iMTX, iHCQ and iGCs were, respectively, (sic)10 832 (14.763), (sic)11 208 (12.801) and (sic)10 502 (11.973). Healthcare costs were mainly determined by biological costs, which were significantly lower in the iHCQ group compared with iGCs (P < 0.05). However, costs due to presenteeism were the highest in the iHCQ group (55%) followed by iMTX (27%) and iGCs (18%). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios did not differ between treatment strategies. At a willingness-to-pay level of (sic)50 000, the Dutch threshold for reimbursement of medical care, iHCQ had the highest probability (38.7%) of being cost-effective, followed by iGCs (31.1%) and iMTX (30.2%). Conclusion: iHCQ had the lowest healthcare and highest productivity costs, resulting in a non-significant incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. However, iHCQ had the highest chance of being cost-effective at the Dutch willingness-to-pay threshold for healthcare reimbursement. Therefore, we believe that iHCQ is a good alternative to iMTX in autoantibody-negative RA patients, but validation is needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据