4.5 Article

A self-powered sensor for drill pipe capable of monitoring rotation speed and direction based on triboelectric nanogenerator

期刊

REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
卷 92, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0045787

关键词

-

资金

  1. Open Foundation of Hubei Intelligent Geological Equipment Engineering Technology Research Center [DZZB202004]
  2. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2019A1515110634]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M650237]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research introduces a self-powered drill pipe sensor based on triboelectric nanogenerators for real-time measurement of rotation speed and direction, showing high measurement accuracy and reliability.
The rotation speed and direction of the drill pipe are the key parameters to control the drilling process, which need to be measured in real-time. Here, a self-powered drill pipe sensor that can measure the rotation speed and direction based on the triboelectric nanogenerators is proposed in this research. The basic working principle is that the single-electrode triboelectric nanogenerator will output the sawtooth signal during the rotation of the drill pipe, so the rotation speed can be measured by counting the signal pulse frequency, and then, the rotation direction can be realized by judging the direction of the tooth tip of the sawtooth signals. Test results show that the measurement range is 0-1000 rpm, the measurement error is less than 4%, the sensitivity is 0.0167 Hz/rpm, and the linearity is 3.5%. Further tests show that the maximum output voltage, current, and power are 21 V, 900 nA, and 3.35 mu W, respectively, when a 107 Omega load resistance is connected in series. In addition, the working condition reliability tests show that the working temperature is less than 150 degrees C and the working relative humidity is less than 90%, with high reliability, which is very suitable for the drilling environments. Published under license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据