4.7 Article

Towards sustainable resource management: identification and quantification of human actions that compromise the accessibility of metal resources

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105403

关键词

Metals; Accessibility; Sustainable resource management; Material flow analysis; Life cycle analysis; Cobalt

资金

  1. FWO [FWO.SAB.2019.0003.01]
  2. Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering of ETH
  3. European Commission [D.B722007]
  4. Flemish administration of Belgium via the Steunpunt Circulaire Economie (Policy Research Centre Circular Economy)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the accessibility of metals and minerals once they have entered the technosphere, identifying six human actions that compromise accessibility and proposing solutions to address resource (in)accessibility. Through a case study on cobalt in the EU, it demonstrates the current challenges and impacts of resource inaccessibility.
Although metals and minerals represent a prominent asset for sustainable development, continuous population growth and the current accelerations in energy and mobility transitions are increasing concerns regarding their accessibility for current and future generations. As recent insights have identified access rather than depletion to be the dominant factor for resources, this paper elaborates on the (in)accessibility concept of such raw materials once they have entered the technosphere. It identifies six human actions that compromise accessibility: emitting, landfilling, tailing, downcycling, hoarding and abandoning. It analyses the degree of the generated inaccessibility and proposes estimated duration of inaccessibility as a proxy. It further explores how current sustainability management tools like material flow analysis and life cycle analysis could be further developed to address resource (in)accessibility. Finally, the paper presents a case study on cobalt in the EU, where five compromising actions make 70% of the extracted cobalt inaccessible due to tailings (21.3%), landfilling (31.2%), downcycling (11.6%), dissipation (1.4%) and hoarding (4.3%); only 30% is used to expand the functional stock.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据