4.6 Review

Should we look for a low-grade threshold for blastocyst transfer? A scoping review

期刊

REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
卷 42, 期 4, 页码 709-716

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.01.019

关键词

Blastocyst; Embryo transfer; Low-grade; Quality; Threshold

资金

  1. NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship [GNT1082548]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Embryo quality is crucial for the success of IVF, with low-grade blastocysts (LGB) not receiving enough attention in existing scoring systems. Studies show that LGB have similar euploidy and pregnancy success rates after implantation, with no adverse effects on pregnancy or perinatal outcomes. Evidence for pregnancy outcomes is lacking for different grades of LGB, with most studies comparing all LGB as one category with optimal blastocysts.
Embryo quality is a key determinant of the success of IVF. Although the focus has been on selecting the best embryo for transfer, the classification of low-grade blastocysts (LGB) in existing scoring systems has received less attention. This is worrisome; embryo freezing allows optimal use of all created embryos, thus maximizing the cumulative live birth rate, which is arguably the most important outcome for infertile couples. A PubMed search was conducted in August 2020, using ?(((?poor-quality? OR ?poor quality?) OR (?low-grade? OR ?low grade?)) AND (?embryo? OR ?blastocyst?)) AND (?pregnancy? OR ?live birth?)?. This scoping review shows that LGB have similar euploidy and pregnancy success rates after implantation and have no adverse effects on pregnancy or perinatal outcomes. Evidence for pregnancy outcomes is lacking for different grades of LGB, with most studies clustering all LQB as one to compare with optimal blastocysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据