4.7 Article

Numerical study of turbulent flow past a rotating axial-flow pump based on a level-set immersed boundary method

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 960-971

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.12.103

关键词

Axial-flow pump; Large-eddy simulation; Immersed boundary method; Level set function; Turbulent kinetic energy; Flow separation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52009033]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20200509]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [B210202066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study utilizes large-eddy simulation to investigate the turbulence characteristics and flow structures of water passing a rotating axial-flow pump under various flow-rate working conditions. The results indicate that tip leakage flow dominates at low flow-rates, while flow separation prevails at high flow-rates under off-designed conditions.
Large-eddy simulation is performed to study the turbulence statistics and flow structures of the water past a rotating axial-flow pump under different flow-rate working conditions. A novel sharp-interface level-set based immersed boundary method is applied to capture the complex geometry of the pump. An unstructured triangular mesh is used to discretize the complex surface geometry of the pump, and a ray-tracing method is employed to classify the computational domain into fluid and solid regions. Turbulence statistics, including the mean velocity, turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), turbulence production, and turbulence dissipation, are analyzed under five different flow-rate working conditions around the designed condition. The results show that unsteady wake, tip leakage flow, and flow separation are accompanied by a high TKE magnitude. For the high turbulence intensity under off-designed working conditions, the tip leakage flow plays a leading role at low flow-rates, and flow separation dominates at high flow-rates. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据