4.8 Review

Urban form and building energy use: A systematic review of measures, mechanisms, and methodologies

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110662

关键词

Sustainable urban form; Building energy consumption; Built environment; Energy efficiency; Classification framework; Pathway map

资金

  1. Creative-Pioneering Researchers Program through the Seoul National University (SNU)
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (Ministry of Science and ICT) [2018R1C1B5043758]
  3. Macau Science and Technology and Development Fund [0039/2020/AFJ]
  4. Macau Foundation [MF1908]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1C1B5043758, 5120200113713] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides a systematic review of the relationship between urban form and building energy use, categorizing existing studies by their measure definitions, mechanism assumptions, and methodologies. It summarizes the main debates regarding the magnitude of influence, impact of densification, and preference of typology, as well as reveals challenges and future research directions in this field.
The relationship between urban form and building energy use has received increasing attention in recent literature. However, findings from existing studies are diverse and sometimes contradictory, and this issue has not been extensively discussed in previous reviews. This paper provides a systematic review of studies on the relationship between urban form and building energy use based on the proposed classification framework. The classification framework categorizes existing studies by their measure definitions, mechanism assumptions, and methodologies. Aside from these conceptual differences, the differences in site contexts of the selected cases are also reviewed. On the basis of the review results, this paper summarizes the consideration of mechanisms by pathway maps and provides an updated understanding of the three main debates in this field. These debates concern the magnitude of influence, impact of densification, and preference of typology. This review also reveals many challenges in this field, including the limited measures of urban form and building energy use, lack of understanding of pathway contributions, and uncertainty and validity issues of tools and models. In addition, future research directions are provided to inform urban planning and policy making decisions for sustainable urban development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据