4.7 Article

Thematic accuracy assessment of the NLCD 2016 land cover for the conterminous United States

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 257, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112357

关键词

Accuracy assessment; Cognitive psychology; Forest disturbance; Land cover; Land cover change; NLCD; Reference data quality; Stratified sampling; Urbanization

资金

  1. SUNY-ESF [G17AC00237]
  2. USGS [G17AC00237]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NLCD is an operational land cover monitoring program in the United States, with data collected every five years. The accuracy of land cover components in the NLCD2016 database was assessed using reference data for 2011 and 2016, showing overall accuracies around 72% for Level II and 79% for Level I components. The changes in mapping methodologies for NLCD2016 led to improved product quality compared to NLCD2011, with overall accuracies 4% to 7% higher.
The National Land Cover Database (NLCD) is an operational land cover monitoring program providing updated land cover and related information for the United States at five-year intervals. NLCD2016 extends temporal coverage to 15 years (2001-2016). We collected land cover reference data for the 2011 and 2016 nominal dates to report land cover accuracy for the NLCD2016 database 2011 and 2016 land cover components at Level II and Level I and for Level I 2011-2016 land cover change using two definitions of agreement. For both the 2011 and 2016 land cover components, single-date Level II overall accuracies (OA) were 72% (standard error of +/- 0.9%) when agreement was defined as match between the map label and primary reference label only and 86% (+/- 0.7%) when agreement also included the alternate reference label. The corresponding level I OA for both dates were 79% (+/- 0.9%) and 91% (+/- 1.0%). The 2011-2016 user's and producer's accuracies (UA and PA) were similar to 75% for forest loss and PA for water loss, grassland loss, and grass gain were > 70% when agreement included a match between the map label and either the primary or alternate reference label. Depending on agreement definition and level of the classification hierarchy, OA for the 2011 land cover component of the NLCD2016 database was about 4% to 7% higher than OA for the 2011 land cover component of the NLCD2011 database, suggesting that the changes in mapping methodologies initiated for production of the NLCD2016 database have led to improved product quality. Additionally, we used the reference dataset collected for assessment of the NLCD2011 database to assess the 2001 and 2006 land cover components of the NLCD2016 database. OA for the 2001 and 2006 land cover components was 1% - 5% lower than OA for the 2011 and 2016 land cover components of the NLCD2016 database. Higher OA for 2011 and 2016 land cover components of the NLCD2016 database relative to OA for its 2001 and 2006 components may be attributable to differences in reference data quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据