4.7 Article

Corrosion risk assessment using adaptive bow-tie (ABT) analysis

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107731

关键词

Corrosion risk assessment; Bow-Tie; Risk; Corrosion; Biocorrosion; microbial influenced corrosion

资金

  1. Genome Canada
  2. Canada Research Chair (Tier I) program in Offshore Safety and Risk Engineering
  3. Suncor
  4. Husky
  5. Research and Development Corporation of Newfoundland (Innovate NL)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper proposes a model for quantitative corrosion risk assessment in oil and gas facilities, focusing on microbiologically influenced corrosion and providing practical statistical verification. The model is believed to help in quantitatively assessing the impact of corrosion, as well as identifying and quantifying actions needed for corrosion prevention and control.
Corrosion is a major threat to safety and asset integrity in oil and gas production and processing facilities. This paper proposes a simple, yet practical model for quantitative corrosion risk assessment from safety and economic perspectives. This includes an Adaptive Bow-Tie (ABT) model for the corrosion risk with a specific focus on microbiologically influenced corrosion, along with corrosion economic risk profile. The ABT model is logically tested using corrosion science and statistically verified using a pipeline corrosion database, including cases of corrosion-induced failures. The ABT model also provides opportunities to run root-cause contribution (RCC) analysis and to estimate the probability of corrosion, corrosion-induced failures, and highly probable sequences leading to failure. The model application is demonstrated using a crude oil transportation pipeline system. The study identifies and quantifies parameters that helps to prioritize the actions needed to prevent and control corrosion and avoid failures. The proposed model can serve as an important mechanism to identify, assess, and manage corrosion threat to an asset.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据