4.5 Article

Neonatal and early childhood outcomes following maternal anesthesia for cesarean section: a population-based cohort

期刊

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE
卷 46, 期 6, 页码 482-489

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102441

关键词

-

资金

  1. Obstetric Anaesthetists Association
  2. Scottish Society of Anaesthetists
  3. Bristol NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
  4. University of Bristol
  5. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_00011/6]
  6. NIHR [NF-0616-10102]
  7. Chief Scientist's Office

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the impact of general anesthesia on neonatal and childhood development outcomes during cesarean section, finding that regardless of urgency, the use of general anesthesia is associated with neonatal resuscitation, low Apgar scores, and neonatal unit admission. The strongest associations were observed in non-urgent cases and at term. Additionally, there was a weak correlation between the use of general anesthesia in emergency cases and having <= 1 concern noted in developmental assessment at 2 years old.
Background The fetus is vulnerable to maternal drug exposure. We determined associations of exposure to spinal, epidural, or general anesthesia on neonatal and childhood development outcomes during the first 1000 days of life. Methods Population-based study of all singleton, cesarean livebirths of 24+0 to 43+6 weeks gestation between January 2007 and December 2016 in Scotland, stratified by urgency with follow-up to age 2 years. Models were adjusted for: maternal age, weight, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, smoking, drug-use, induction, parity, previous cesarean or abortion, pre-eclampsia, gestation, birth weight, and sex. Results 140 866 mothers underwent cesarean section (41.2% (57,971/140,866) elective, 58.8% (82,895/140,866) emergency) with general anesthesia used in 3.2% (1877/57,971) elective and 9.8% (8158/82,895) of emergency cases. In elective cases, general anesthesia versus spinal was associated with: neonatal resuscitation (crude event rate 16.2% vs 1.9% (adjusted RR 8.20, 95% CI 7.20 to 9.33), Apgar <7 at 5 min (4.6% vs 0.4% (adjRR 11.44, 95% CI 8.88 to 14.75)), and neonatal admission (8.6% vs 4.9% (adjRR 1.65, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.94)). Associations were similar in emergencies; resuscitation (32.2% vs 12.3% (adjRR 2.40, 95% CI 2.30 to 2.50)), Apgar <7 (12.6% vs 2.8% (adjRR 3.87, 95% CI 3.56 to 4.20), and admission (31.6% vs 19.9% (adjRR 1.20, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.25). There was a weak association between general anesthesia in emergency cases and having <= 1 concern noted in developmental assessment at 2 years (21.0% vs 16.5% (adjRR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.16)). Conclusions General anesthesia for cesarean section, irrespective of urgency, is associated with neonatal resuscitation, low Apgar, and neonatal unit admission. Associations were strongest in non-urgent cases and at term. Further evaluation of long-term outcomes is warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据