4.7 Review

Can attention bias modification augment the effect of CBT for anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 299, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113892

关键词

Attentional bias modification; Cognitive behavioral therapy; Anxiety; Attentional bias

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Attention Bias Modification (ABM) and Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) may have complementary effects on clinically anxious patients, especially when ABM is conducted integrally within CBT sessions. Older participants and patients with social anxiety disorder may benefit less from the combination of ABM and CBT.
Attention Bias Modification (ABM) is a novel computerized therapy for anxiety disorders and is thought to augment the effect of Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) as it may target different mechanisms. Recently, a growing number of studies have examined the combined effects of ABM and CBT on clinically anxious patients, with mixed results. This review examined the combined efficacy of ABM and CBT. A literature search was conducted in four main databases: PsycINFO, Embase, Pubmed and the Cochrane library, resulting in 11 randomized studies. The combination of ABM and CBT had small but significant effects on clinician-rated anxiety symptoms and attention bias towards threat compared to the control group, while ESs for anxiety (all measures), self-reported or parent-reported anxiety measures and depression symptoms were non-significant. Studies in which ABM was conducted as an integral part of each CBT session yielded greater reduction in anxiety symptoms than those conducting ABM and CBT at separate time points. Older participants and patients with social anxiety disorder tended to benefit less from the combination of ABM and CBT based on bias scores. This study may provide preliminary evidence that ABM and CBT have the potential to complement each other, especially when they are conducted integrally.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据