4.2 Article

Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test: Translated and Korean Versions

期刊

PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 295-+

出版社

KOREAN NEUROPSYCHIATRIC ASSOC
DOI: 10.30773/pi.2020.0289

关键词

Theory of mind; Social cognition; Reliability; Item difficulty; Psychometric properties

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT AMP
  2. Future Planning, Republic of Korea [2017R1A2B3008214]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A2B3008214] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study developed a Korean version of the RMET using Korean eye stimuli and found acceptable psychometric properties, with good internal consistency and test-retest reliability, but less ideal results in confirmatory factor analysis.
Objective The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) was developed by using Caucasian eyes, which may not be appropriate to be used in Korean. The aims of the present study were 1) to develop a Korean version of the RMET (K-RMET) by using Korean eye stimuli and 2) to examine the psychometric properties of the Korean-translated version of the RMET and the K-RMET. Methods Thirty-six photographs of Korean eyes were selected. A total of 196 (101 females) healthy subjects were asked to take the Korean-translated version of the RMET and K-RMET. To assess internal consistency reliability, Cronbach?s alpha coefficients were computed, and test?retest reliability was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item analysis were also conducted. Results Internal consistency, measured by Cronbach?s alpha, was 0.542 for the Korean-translated version of the RMET, and 0.540 for the K-RMET. Test?retest reliability (n=25), measured by the ICC, was 0.787 for the Korean-translated version of the RMET, and 0.758 for the K-RMET. In CFA, the assumed single and 3-factor model fit indices were not good in the both types of RMETs. There was difficulty in discrimination in nine items of the Korean-translated version of the RMET and 10 items of the K-RMET. Conclusion The psychometric properties of both the Korean-translated version of the RMET and the K-RMET are acceptable. Both tests are applicable to the clinical population, as well as the general population in Korea. Psychiatry Investig 2021;18(4):295-303

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据