4.7 Article

Optimisation of smoke extraction system in fire scenarios using CFD modelling

期刊

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 508-517

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.11.036

关键词

Fire safety; Detector layout; Fire dynamics simulator (FDS); Visibility assessment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the consequences of fuel release and fire accidents is crucial for the design and construction of buildings and infrastructures. A framework for simulating liquefied petroleum gas heat release and modeling evacuee visibility during fire events using CFD model has been proposed in this study, aiming to enhance fire safety in buildings.
Understanding the consequences of fuel release and fire accident is an important aspect of the design and construction of buildings and infrastructures. Particularly, an increasing number of catastrophic consequences of recent fire accidents in high-rise buildings has led to the demand for a rigorous and holistic approach for infrastructure fire safety analysis and performance evaluation. The current study proposes a framework for liquefied petroleum gas heat release simulations and modelling the visibility of evacuees on the egress path during a fire event using efficient computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model. The framework consists of scenario modelling, optimised smoke detector layout, mechanical smoke extraction system, and visibility analysis. The CFD simulation is first validated using experimental data demonstrating a very good agreement. A case study for detector layout is then considered, showing the proposed approach increases the visibility of the egress path along the corridor of a building during fuel release and fire accident. The study will offer an effective platform for modelling fire risk and assessing the performance of fire safety mechanisms in buildings which can be also beneficial to enhance urban infrastructures safety. ? 2020 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据