4.7 Article

Simultaneous PM2.5 and moisture removal from wet flue gas by a gas-liquid cross flow array

期刊

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 382-391

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.10.019

关键词

PM2.5; Moisture removal; Condenser; Exhaust gas; Diffusiophoresis; Gas liquid cross flow

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21276161, 11905029]
  2. Research Foundation for Advanced Talents of East China University of Technology [DHBK2018045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A gas-liquid cross-flow array (GLCA) system is proposed for simultaneous removal of PM2.5 and moisture from wet flue gas, with analytical models developed to predict removal efficiency and experiments conducted to verify the models. The results show that PM2.5 removal efficiency is proportional to moisture removal amount, and can be increased significantly through moisture condensation.
A gas-liquid cross-flow array (GLCA) system is proposed as the direct condensing technique for PM2.5 and moisture simultaneous removal from the wet flue gas. Such a GLCA with huge surface area is formed by numerous vertically down-flowing wastewater films along a number of wires through a perforated distributor. And each falling film acts as an independent sink to remove PM2.5 and moisture. Analytical models are developed to predict PM2.5 and moisture removal efficiency of a GLCA, based on the differential equation of convection diffusion with diffusiophoresis (DP), the only considering mechanism of PM2.5 removal. The models indicate that PM2.5 removal efficiency is proportional to the moisture removal amount, and PM2.5 removal efficiency can be increased sharply due to moisture condensation. Experiments with a lab-scale GLCA are carried out with variable humidity of inlet gas, and a constant gas (60 degrees C) and water (20 degrees C) temperature. The experimental measurements for PM2.5 and moisture removal generally compare satisfactorily with the model predictions. (C) 2020 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据