4.8 Article

A glutaminase isoform switch drives therapeutic resistance and disease progression of prostate cancer

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2012748118

关键词

prostate cancer; therapeutic resistance; glutaminase; GAC

资金

  1. Department of Defense [DOD-W81XWH-19-1-0411]
  2. Prostate Cancer Foundation Movember Valor Challenge Award
  3. National Cancer Institute [K99-K99CA237618]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identifies a metabolic mechanism in prostate cancer where a switch in glutaminase isoforms contributes to therapeutic resistance and disease progression. The expression of GAC leads to increased glutamine utilization and aggressive behavior of tumor cells in the absence of androgen, ultimately impacting treatment outcomes.
Cellular metabolism in cancer is significantly altered to support the uncontrolled tumor growth. How metabolic alterations contribute to hormonal therapy resistance and disease progression in prostate cancer (PCa) remains poorly understood. Here we report a glutaminase isoform switch mechanism that mediates the initial therapeutic effect but eventual failure of hormonal therapy of PCa. Androgen deprivation therapy inhibits the expression of kidney-type glutaminase (KGA), a splicing isoform of glutaminase 1 (GLS1) up-regulated by androgen receptor (AR), to achieve therapeutic effect by suppressing glutaminolysis. Eventually the tumor cells switch to the expression of glutaminase C (GAC), an androgen-independent GLS1 isoform with more potent enzymatic activity, under the androgen-deprived condition. This switch leads to increased glutamine utilization, hyperproliferation, and aggressive behavior of tumor cells. Pharmacological inhibition or RNA interference of GAC shows better treatment effect for castration-resistant PCa than for hormone-sensitive PCa in vitro and in vivo. In summary, we have identified a metabolic function of AR action in PCa and discovered that the GLS1 isoform switch is one of the key mechanisms in therapeutic resistance and disease progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据