4.8 Article

Pharmacological modulation of T cell immunity results in long-term remission of autoimmune arthritis

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2100939118

关键词

autoimmunity; DNA-methylation inhibitor; rheumatoid arthritis; indoleamine 2; 3-dioxygenase

资金

  1. Epsom Medical Research
  2. Idogen AB
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST1042911I182A503]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that decitabine can promote the generation of regulatory T cells and has the potential to treat rheumatoid arthritis. It alleviates inflammation by inducing the expansion of induced regulatory T cells and selectively inducing apoptosis of Th1 and Th17 cells.
Chronic inflammatory diseases like rheumatoid arthritis are characterized by a deficit in fully functional regulatory T cells. DNAmethylation inhibitors have previously been shown to promote regulatory T cell responses and, in the present study, we evaluated their potential to ameliorate chronic and acute animal models of rheumatoid arthritis. Of the drugs tested, decitabine was the most effective, producing a sustained therapeutic effect that was dependent on indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and was associated with expansion of induced regulatory T cells, particularly at the site of disease activity. Treatment with decitabine also caused apoptosis of Th1 and Th17 cells in active arthritis in a highly selective manner. The molecular basis for this selectivity was shown to be ENT1, a nucleoside transporter, which facilitates intracellular entry of the drug and is upregulated on effector T cells during active arthritis. It was further shown that short-term treatment with decitabine resulted in the generation of a population of regulatory T cells that were able to suppress arthritis upon adoptive transfer. In summary, a therapeutic approach using an approved drug is described that treats active inflammatory disease effectively and generates robust regulatory T cells with the IDO-dependent capacity to maintain remission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据