4.7 Editorial Material

Applying social norms interventions to increase adherence to COVID-19 prevention and control guidelines

期刊

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106424

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  2. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
  3. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
  4. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the guidelines for COVID-19 prevention, many individuals do not adhere to recommendations, putting themselves and others at risk. This manuscript discusses the use of social psychological perspectives to understand non-adherence and provides examples of how these theories can be applied to control the pandemic. Concrete actions based on social psychological research are suggested to increase adherence to COVID-19 recommendations and improve prevention and control of the virus.
Despite widespread national, state, and local guidelines for COVID-19 prevention, including social distancing and mask orders, many people continue to not adhere to recommendations, including congregating in groups for non-essential activities, putting themselves and others at risk. A social psychological perspective can be used to understand reasons for lack of adherence to policies and methods for increasing adherence based on successes from other behavior change campaigns. This manuscript seeks to describe some of the social psychological research that may be relevant to COVID-19 prevention and behavior change, describe how these theories have been previously applied in various domains to change behavior, and provide examples of how these approaches might be similarly applied to control the pandemic. We provide concrete examples of actions that can be taken based on social psychological research that might help to increase adherence to COVID-19 recommendations and improve prevention and control of the virus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据