4.7 Article

Azadirachta indica A. Juss (Meliaceae) microencapsulated bioinsecticide: Spray drying technique optimization, characterization, in vitro release, and degradation kinetics

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 382, 期 -, 页码 144-161

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.11.079

关键词

Neem tree; Microencapsulated dry extract; Gum arabic; Maltodextrin; and Spray dryer

资金

  1. Universidade Estadual de Goias (UEG) [010/2017/CCB]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) [88887.179822/2018-00]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Goias (FAPEG) [201310267001419]
  4. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [314632/2018-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study optimized the spray drying conditions for microencapsulated extracts from Azadirachta indica seeds, and evaluated the release and degradation kinetics. The findings support industrial scale-up studies and field application measures.
Insecticides based on Azadirachta indica have been demonstrated as useful in pest control and bioinsecticides that are microencapsulated can reduce the amount of product utilized, and minimize impacts on the environment and human health. The objective of this study was to optimize drying, and evaluate the release and degradation kinetics of microencapsulated extracts from A. indica seeds. The Box-Behnken model (33) and surface response methodologies were used to find the best spray drying conditions for the chosen variables. They were: in-let temperature of 160 degrees C, feed flow of 3.3 mL/min, and nozzle diameter of 0.7 mm. The drying efficiency and EE under these conditions were respectively 71.15% +/- 2.18 and 56.88% +/- 0.28. In the release kinetics study, the release time for Azadirachtin (100%) was 20h. The 50% photo-degradation time for Azadirachtin was 21.07 days. Our results support industrial scale-up studies, and can help application measures in the field. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据