4.7 Article

Low velocity impact performance of fiber-reinforced polymer impregnated with shear thickening fluid

期刊

POLYMER TESTING
卷 96, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107095

关键词

Low velocity impact; Shear thickening fluid; Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP); Energy dissipation; Resistive force

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51878420]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [20180551265]
  3. Shenyang young and middle-aged talent support program [RC190195]
  4. Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC1807273, XLYC1902038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The impregnation of STF can effectively enhance the impact resistance performance of the three FRP types, with different effects and mechanisms observed. The STF significantly improves the mechanical performance of CFRP, while it changes the mechanical mechanism of GFRP.
In this study, the mechanical performance of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) impregnated with shear thickening fluid (STF) under low-velocity impact was investigated. Three types of FRPs, with basalt (BFRP), carbon (CFRP), and glass (GFRP) fibers were prepared and 20 wt% STF was impregnated into these FRPs to develop FRP composite materials. The resistive force and energy dissipation of STF-impregnated FRP (FRP-STF) specimens and corresponding neat FRP specimens were evaluated using a drop hammer test. The test results demonstrate that the impregnation of the STF can effectively enhance the impact resistance performance of the three FRPs. Nevertheless, the enhancing effect and mechanism are different for different FRP types. For the BFRP and CFRP, the STF only improves their mechanical performance, while for the GFRP, the STF changes its mechanical mechanism. In terms of maximum enhancement resistive force, the STF has a significant effect on the CFRP, with a 78.0% increase compared to neat CFRP. In addition, the GFRP-STF shows excellent energy dissipation performance; the energy absorbability is increased to 90.7%, an increase of 119% compared to neat GFRP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据