4.5 Article

Preparation and properties of bacterial cellulose/graphene oxide composite films using dyeing method

期刊

POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE
卷 61, 期 6, 页码 1854-1863

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pen.25706

关键词

bacterial cellulose; graphene oxide composites; dyeing method; mechanical and electrical properties

资金

  1. Chulalongkorn University [GCUGR1125633059D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial cellulose (BC) hydrogels were cultured using a kombucha SCOBY starter, and BC/graphene oxide (GO) composite films were prepared. The mechanical properties of different films were investigated, showing that an increase in dyeing time resulted in flexible conductive composite films with excellent mechanical properties.
In this study, bacterial cellulose (BC) hydrogels were cultured from a kombucha SCOBY starter. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results indicated that the dried BC exhibited an interpenetrating fibrous mat. The BC films harvested for 5, 10, and 15 days were 15-19, 14.4-24, and 30-31 mu m thick, respectively. Then, BC/graphene oxide (GO) composite films were prepared via the exhaust dyeing method. GO sheets penetrated the BC matrix, resulting in the formation of a BC/GO composite, as revealed by the SEM analysis results. The mechanical properties of the composite films were investigated. Compared with virgin BC, the tensile strength of the composite films was higher, while the %E at break was lower, resulting in a significant increase in the Young's modulus. The X-ray diffraction results indicated that an increase in the dyeing time (0.5-2 h) gradually induced cellulose crystalline conformation, which in turn affected the swelling ability, mechanical properties, and electrical properties of the BC/GO composite films. After the reduction of GO to reduced GO (rGO), flexible conductive BC/rGO films were obtained, as confirmed by their resistivity values. Thus, flexible conductive composite films with excellent mechanical properties were successfully fabricated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据