4.7 Article

An effective nucleating agent for isotactic polypropylene (iPP): Zinc bis- (nadic anhydride) double-decker silsesquioxanes

期刊

POLYMER
卷 220, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.123574

关键词

Isotactic polypropylene; POSS-based nucleating agent; Fast scanning calorimetry (FSC)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21878089, 21606084]
  2. National key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0302201]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [22221818010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study synthesized zinc bicyclo [2.2.1]-heptane-2, 3-dicarboxylate-double-decker silsesquioxanes (Zn2(DDSQ-ND)) for the first time and investigated its effect as a novel and effective nucleating agent in the crystallization behavior of isotactic polypropylene (iPP). The results showed that Zn2(DDSQ-ND) accelerated the formation of ?-phase iPP and acted as a novel ?-nucleating agent in the iPP system.
The zinc bicyclo [2.2.1]-heptane-2, 3-dicarboxylate-double-decker silsesquioxanes (Zn2(DDSQ-ND)) was firstly synthesized and the crystallization behavior of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) filled with different amount of Zn2(DDSQ-ND) (0?1 wt %) was investigated in detail. With the addition of Zn2(DDSQ-ND), the crystallization temperature enhanced significantly, indicating that it acted novel and effective nucleating agent in the iPP system. The morphology of spherulites, nucleation density, and the crystal structure of the samples were characterized using POM and WAXD. Besides, ultra-fast scanning calorimetry (FSC) was employed to study the effects of Zn2(DDSQ-ND) on the non-isothermal and isothermal crystallization behaviors of the sample iPP/Zn2(DDSQND) under the high cooling rates and wide crystallization temperature ranges, as well as the cold crystallization and recrystallization behavior during the heating process. The data suggested that Zn2(DDSQ-ND) accelerated the formation of ?-phase iPP and acted as a novel ?-nucleating agent in the iPP system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据