4.6 Article

A synopsis of Salvatoria McIntosh, 1885 (Annelida: Syllidae: Exogoninae) from Brazilian coastal and oceanic waters

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250472

关键词

-

资金

  1. CAPES [1541399]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior
  3. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2016/50373-6, 2007/53040-9, 2010/19424-7, 2014/11549-6, 2009/17606-3, 2014/01285-1]
  4. CNPq [309599/2018-0, 303939/2014-1, 403940/2012-5]
  5. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development
  6. FAPERJ [E-26/202607/2019]
  7. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compiled records of the Salvatoria genus from Brazilian coastal and oceanic habitats, presenting 12 species including 8 previously reported and 3 new species. A dichotomous identification key and a comparative table with morphological data were provided.
We compiled the records for the genus Salvatoria from Brazilian coastal and oceanic habitats, collected by several projects along the years. Here we present 12 species, eight of which already reported-S. breviarticulatacomb. nov., S. clavata, S. euritmica, S. heterocirra, S. limbata, S. longiarticulatacomb. nov., S. neapolitana and S. cf. nitidula-with comments regarding the confidence of some of these records. We also describe three new species, S. marielleaen. sp. and Salvatoria nitiduloidesn. sp., based on material from Fernando de Noronha and Trindade islands, off the Northeastern Brazilian coast, and S. ypsiloidesn. sp., from Fernando de Noronha and also, Campos Basin, off Southeastern Brazilian coast, in depths down to 970 m. Finally, we report a probably undescribed species, Salvatoria sp., represented by only one specimen lacking median antenna, preventing us to proceed with further identification properly. A dichotomous identification key and a comparative table with morphological data of specimens belonging to these species are also provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据